Reviewing Criteria

The following criteria is followed when reviewing the ECSS Young Investigator Award abstracts.

•    The work is original - ergo not published, or accepted for publication, at the time of the abstract submission deadline
•    The research has relevance for sport and/or exercise and its effects on performance and/or health and/or aspects of well-being
•    The presentation (oral or mini-oral) has been carefully prepared, is using appropriate and high quality visual means and is well organized/structured
•    High quality of technical presentation of oral or mini-oral (delivery speed, clearly audible, varied tone, confident delivery, pointer use (oral only), correct use of scientific terminology)
•    The background and relevance is clearly described
•    The work is innovative
•    The methodology is sound and the data are solid
•    There are quantitative data in the presentation, the study has enough power and appropriate statistical tests have been performed to underpin claims on significance
•    There is a clear conclusion or take home message at the end
•    The work either has a high impact for the area of research or has a potential future high impact (e.g. development of new methodologies that will generate new knowledge)

ECSS Partners

xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx

Supported by

SporTools GmbH
failte ireland
meet in ireland

 

Media

Congress Office

ECSS Congress Dublin 2018
Mrs Nantia Patera
Feldblumenweg 26
50858 Cologne - Germany
ECSS Congress Dublin 2018

office@ecss-congress.eu

Phone availability after 15th April 2018

  • Monday and Tuesday: 10:00 - 12:00
  • Friday: 14:00 - 16:00 CET
  • (Central European Time)